United States v. Deandre Meighan
United States v. Deandre Meighan
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 19 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-30008 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00008-WFN v. MEMORANDUM* DEANDRE DERRICK MEIGHAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 16, 2018** Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Deandre Derrick Meighan appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 100-month concurrent sentences imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Meighan’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Meighan the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 16-30008
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.