Juan Teoco v. Jefferson Sessions

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Juan Teoco v. Jefferson Sessions, 713 F. App'x 563 (9th Cir. 2018)

Juan Teoco v. Jefferson Sessions

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Jr Cabujat Teoco and Erlinda Hiso Teoco, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider, where petitioners did not show the BIA made an error.of law or fact in its prior decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (“A motion to reconsider shall state the reasons for the motion by specifying the errors of fact or law in the prior Board decision and shall be supported by pertinent authority.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Juan Jr Cabujat TEOCO and Erlinda Hiso Teoco, Petitioners, v. Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent
Status
Unpublished