U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Rollin Spencer

United States v. Rollin Spencer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2018

United States v. Rollin Spencer

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30115 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:07-cr-00005-TMB v. MEMORANDUM* ROLLIN LEE SPENCER, a.k.a. Spence Leigh Roland, a.k.a. Steven L. Spencer, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted March 13, 2018** Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Rollin Lee Spencer appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the revocation of his supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Spencer’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Spencer has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

All remaining requests for relief, including those contained in Spencer’s January 22, 2018, letter to the court, are DENIED.

AFFIRMED.

2 17-30115

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.