United States v. Javier Reyes-Ramirez
United States v. Javier Reyes-Ramirez
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 17-10279 17-10280 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:17-cr-00506-SPL v. 2:14-cr-01014-SPL JAVIER REYES-RAMIREZ, a.k.a. Jose MEMORANDUM* Sergio Reyes-Mejorano, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 13, 2018** Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Javier Reyes-Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive 19-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), Reyes-Ramirez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Reyes-Ramirez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Reyes-Ramirez waived his right to appeal his conviction, the revocation of supervised release, and his sentences. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss these appeals. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2 17-10279 & 17-10280
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.