NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 23 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSEPH D. ADDISON III, No. 17-55732 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:15-cv-01259-JVS-AJW v. MEMORANDUM* CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR MEN; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 11, 2018** Before: SILVERMAN, PAEZ, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Joseph D. Addison III, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his post-judgment motion for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Sch.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Addison’s motion for reconsideration because Addison failed to establish any basis for such relief.

See id. at 1263 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)).

AFFIRMED.

2 17-55732