U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2018

Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young

Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 9, 2018

Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN MORRIS; KELLY No. 13-16599 MCDANIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others D.C. No. similarly situated, 5:12-cv-04964-RMW Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION ERNST & YOUNG, LLP; ERNST & YOUNG U.S., LLP, Defendants-Appellees.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed July 9, 2018 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Sandra S.

Ikuta and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion 2 MORRIS V. ERNST & YOUNG OPINION PER CURIAM: In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion dated May 21, 2018, the opinion of this Court dated August 22, 2016, 834 F.3d 975 is VACATED and judgment is entered AFFIRMING the district court’s grant of Defendant- Appellees’ motion to compel arbitration.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.