NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 26 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EKO PAKU SADEWO, No. 14-71034 Petitioner, Agency No. A095-630-138 v. MEMORANDUM* JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted October 22, 2018** Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Eko Paku Sadewo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition and remand.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Because the BIA did not have the benefit of our intervening opinion Salim v. Lynch, 831 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2016) when rendering its decision in this case, we grant the petition and remand to allow the agency to address the application of Salim, if any, to Sadewo’s motion to reopen.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

2 14-71034