United States v. Alfonso Banderas-Martinez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Alfonso Banderas-Martinez

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-30232

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:16-cr-00053-SPW v.

MEMORANDUM* ALFONSO BANDERAS-MARTINEZ, a.k.a. Alfonso Martinez-Solorio,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 22, 2018** Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Alfonso Banderas-Martinez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.

Banderas-Martinez contends that the district court erred by denying a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and its application of the Guidelines to the facts for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Gasca-Ruiz, 852 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The record shows that the district court denied the minor role adjustment after considering each of the factors, see U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C), and did not base the denial on clearly erroneous factual findings. The district court’s decision to deny a minor role reduction was not an abuse of discretion in light of Banderas-Martinez’s participation in multiple high-quantity deliveries to several lesser associates and the amount of methamphetamine involved in the offense. See United States v. Quintero-Leyva, 823 F.3d 519, 523 (9th Cir. 2016).

AFFIRMED.

2 17-30232

Reference

Status
Unpublished