U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Vaughn James

United States v. Vaughn James
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 13, 2018

United States v. Vaughn James

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 13 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10154 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:15-cr-08178-SRB-1 v. VAUGHN PAUL JAMES, MEMORANDUM* and Defendant-Appellant. ORDER Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 16, 2018*** San Francisco, California Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, GRABER, Circuit Judge, and LASNIK,*** District Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Vaughn Paul James pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting second degree murder, and he waived his right to appeal. He was

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. sentenced to 25 years of imprisonment. James’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). James has not filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government did not file an answering brief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Our review of the Anders brief, and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), do not reveal any arguable issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 17-10109

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.