NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 3 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 18-10064 18-10065 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:17-cr-01203-JGZ v. 4:17-cr-50161-JGZ CRISOFORO FIDEL MEJIA-PEDRAZA, MEMORANDUM* a.k.a. Crisoforo Fidel Pedraza, a.k.a. Javier Mejia-Pedazo, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 27, 2018** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Crisoforo Fidel Mejia-Pedraza appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and 6-month

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). partially concurrent sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mejia-Pedraza’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Mejia-Pedraza has filed a “motion,” which we treat as a pro se supplemental brief and motion for appointment of new counsel. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in these direct appeals.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Mejia-Pedraza’s pro se motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.

2 18-10064 & 18-10065