U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2018

United States v. Jerome Bell

United States v. Jerome Bell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 5, 2018

United States v. Jerome Bell

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-10269 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00011-JCM v. MEMORANDUM* JEROME MICHAEL BELL, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 27, 2018** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

The stay issued in this appeal on September 29, 2017, is lifted.

Jerome Michael Bell appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Bell contends that his armed bank robbery conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d) does not qualify as a predicate crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). This argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Watson, 881 F.3d 782 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 203 (2018).

AFFIRMED.

2 16-10269

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.