United States v. Arthur Blacksher, Jr.
United States v. Arthur Blacksher, Jr.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-15190
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:16-cv-03392-JSW 4:04-cr-00030-JSW v.
ARTHUR EDWARD BLACKSHER, Jr., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 27, 2018**
Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Arthur Edward Blacksher, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment
denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Blacksher contends that his armed bank robbery conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2113
§ 4B1.1. This argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Watson, 881 F.3d 782
(9th Cir.), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 203 (2018). Compare 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
with U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1).
AFFIRMED.
2 18-15190
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished