Johnny Franklin, Jr. v. Rohlfing
Johnny Franklin, Jr. v. Rohlfing
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHNNY L. FRANKLIN, Jr., No. 18-15561
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00057-KJM-DB v.
MEMORANDUM* ROHLFING; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 27, 2018** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Johnny L. Franklin, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 2004). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Franklin failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to Franklin’s health condition. See id. at 1057-60 (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk to inmate health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference).
AFFIRMED.
2 18-15561
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished