United States v. Randall Franz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Randall Franz

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-30178

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 9:17-cr-00018-DLC v.

MEMORANDUM* RANDALL ALAN FRANZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019** Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Randall Alan Franz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and eight-month sentence for concealment of assets in bankruptcy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Franz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Franz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Franz waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 18-30178

Reference

Status
Unpublished