NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 23 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JORGE TEJEDA-ESPINOSA, No. 17-72987 Petitioner, Agency No. A201-179-108 v. MEMORANDUM* MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Immigration Judge’s Decision Submitted January 15, 2019** Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Tejeda-Espinosa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that he did not have a reasonable fear of torture in Mexico and thus is not entitled to relief from a reinstated removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings. Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016). We review legal questions de novo. Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077, 1081 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Tejeda-Espinosa failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Mexico. See Andrade-Garcia, 828 F.3d at 836 (“[a] general ineffectiveness on the government’s part to investigate and prevent crime will not suffice to show acquiescence.”).

We reject as without merit Tejeda-Espinosa’s contentions that the IJ mischaracterized his testimony, ignored his documentary evidence, or applied an incorrect legal standard.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 17-72987