NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 13 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) No. 16-16368 ANTITRUST LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST ------------------------------ INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, ORDER* Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN FINN; LAURA TOWNSEND FORTMAN, Objectors-Appellants, v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD; SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.; SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA.; SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

CO., LTD.; HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc.; HITACHI AMERICA, LTD; HITACHI ASIA, LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD; PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED; PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.; THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.; THOMSON SA, Defendants-Appellees.

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) No. 16-16371 ANTITRUST LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST ------------------------------ INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEAN HULL; GORDON B. MORGAN, Objectors-Appellants, v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA

INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD; SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.; SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA.; SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc.; HITACHI AMERICA, LTD; HITACHI ASIA, LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD; PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED; PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.; THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.; THOMSON SA, Defendants-Appellees.

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) No. 16-16373 ANTITRUST LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST ------------------------------ INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY GIANASCA; GLORIA COMEAUX; MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr.; JEFFREY SPEAECT; ROSEMARY CICCONE; JEFF CRAIG, Objectors-Appellants, v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD; SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.; SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA.; SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc.; HITACHI AMERICA, LTD; HITACHI ASIA, LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD; PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; PHILIPS TAIWAN

LIMITED; PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.; THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.; THOMSON SA, Defendants-Appellees.

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) No. 16-16374 ANTITRUST LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST ------------------------------ INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONNIE CLIFTON, Objector-Appellant, v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD; SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.; SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA.; SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc.; HITACHI AMERICA, LTD;

HITACHI ASIA, LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD; PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED; PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.; THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.; THOMSON SA, Defendants-Appellees.

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) No. 16-16378 ANTITRUST LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST ------------------------------ INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAN L. WILLIAMS & CO., Objector-Appellant, v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC; TOSHIBA AMERICA

ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD; SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.; SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA.; SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc.; HITACHI AMERICA, LTD; HITACHI ASIA, LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD; PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED; PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.; THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.; THOMSON SA, Defendants-Appellees.

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) No. 16-16379 ANTITRUST LITIGATION, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST ------------------------------ INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY; GARY

TALEWSKY; HARRY GARAVANIAN, Objectors-Appellants, v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD; SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.; SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA.; SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc.; HITACHI AMERICA, LTD; HITACHI ASIA, LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD; PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED; PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.; THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.; THOMSON SA, Defendants-Appellees.

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) No. 16-16399

ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 16-16400 ------------------------------ D.C. No. 3:07-cv-05944-JST INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTHONY GIANASCA; GLORIA COMEAUX; MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr.; JEFFREY SPEAECT; ROSEMARY CICCONE; JEFF CRAIG, Movants-Appellants, v. TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.; TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD; SAMSUNG SDI MEXICO S.A. DE C.V.; SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA.; SHENZEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; TIANJIN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc.; HITACHI AMERICA, LTD; HITACHI ASIA, LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.; PANASONIC CORPORATION, FKA

Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("MEI"), is a Japanese entity; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; MT PICTURE DISPLAY CO., LTD; PHILIPS KONINKLIJKE N.V.; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; PHILIPS TAIWAN LIMITED; PHILIPS DO BRASIL LTDA.; THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC.; THOMSON SA, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 10, 2018 Submission Vacated April 30, 2018 Re-Submitted February 13, 2019 San Francisco, California Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges, and Gary S. Katzmann,* Judge.

On November 8, 2018, in response to Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ motion for an indicative ruling pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1, the District Court stated that, “with the benefit of hindsight . . . it erred in approving the parties’ original settlement” now pending on appeal in our court. The district court recognized that it should have provided recovery to class members in the

* The Honorable Gary S. Katzmann, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

Omitted Repealer States, Massachusetts, Missouri, and New Hampshire, which necessarily affects the remaining issues on appeal: 1) the adequacy of representation under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4); and 2) the attorneys’ fees awarded to Lead Counsel.

We therefore remand this case so that the district court may reconsider its approval of the settlement.

The Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ motion for a stay, filed October 1, 2018 (Dkt. No. 226), and the Objector-Appellants’ motion for leave to file an enlarged response (Dkt. Nos. 223 & 224) are DENIED as moot.

The Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion Requesting Remand with Instructions Regarding: (1) The Plan of Distribution for the Settlements; and (2) The Fee Order, filed January 9, 2019 (Dkt. No. 230), is DENIED.1 The Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages, filed January 29, 2019 (Dkt. No. 233), is GRANTED. The Reply brief has already been filed (Dkt. No 234). The request of Objectors-Appellants to file a Surreply to that Reply, contained within their Opposition to the Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Dkt. 235), is DENIED as moot.

Objector-Appellants’ motion to supplement the record on appeal (Dkt. No. 120) and motion to strike Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs’ response to the same (Dkt.

No. 150) are DENIED as moot. Objector-Appellants’ and Defendant-Appellees’ motions to take judicial notice (Dkt. Nos. 130, 197) are DENIED as moot.

The motions to dismiss appeal voluntarily filed by Objectors-Appellants Sean Hull (Dkt. No. 198), John Finn and Laura Townsend Fortman (Dkt. No. 199), Donnie Clifton (Dkt. No. 200), and Josie Saik (Dkt. No. 222) are GRANTED.

We therefore REMAND to the District Court to reconsider its order on class certification and settlement approval. We do not vacate the order at this time.

The current panel will retain responsibility for future appeals in this case.

Each party shall bear its own costs of appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.