Karim Kamal v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARIM CHRISTIAN KAMAL, No. 18-55759

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-04555-GW-RAO v.

MEMORANDUM* TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, in official capacity; PATRICIA A. BIGELOW, in official capacity,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2019** Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Karim Christian Kamal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Article III standing. Lopez v. Candaele, 630 F.3d 775, 784-85 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Kamal’s action because Kamal failed to allege facts sufficient to show an injury in fact. See id. at 785 (elements of Article III standing).

Kamal’s motion to augment the record and to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 9) is denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 18-55759