Lilibeth Mendez Aleluya v. William Barr
Lilibeth Mendez Aleluya v. William Barr
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LILIBETH MENDEZ ALELUYA, No. 17-72743 Petitioner, Agency No. A096-053-772 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted May 21, 2019** Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Lilibeth Mendez Aleluya, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary decision not to reopen proceedings sua sponte, and Mendez Aleluya does not raise a claim of error
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). underlying the sua sponte determination that would invoke our jurisdiction. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (the court’s jurisdiction to review BIA decisions denying sua sponte reopening is limited to reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or constitutional error).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
2 17-72743
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.