U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Cesar Zuniga

United States v. Cesar Zuniga
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 23, 2019

United States v. Cesar Zuniga

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-50135 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00644-DSF-1 v. MEMORANDUM* CESAR ZUNIGA, AKA Christian Briant Beltran, AKA Black, AKA Cesar Black, AKA Blackie, AKA Cesar Garcia, AKA Moreno, AKA Cesar Adrian Zuniga, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 21, 2019** Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Zuniga appeals from the revocation of supervised release and the 24- month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Zuniga’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 18-50135

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.