U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2019

Bd of Trustees Glazing Health v. Shannon Chambers

Bd of Trustees Glazing Health v. Shannon Chambers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 22, 2019

Bd of Trustees Glazing Health v. Shannon Chambers

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE No. 16-15588 GLAZING HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE D.C. No. SOUTHERN NEVADA GLAZIERS AND 2:15-cv-01754- FABRICATORS PENSION TRUST FUND; KJD-VCF BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS UNION LOCAL 525 PENSION PLAN; THE ORDER BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTERS, GLAZIERS AND FLOORCOVERERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND JOURNEYMAN TRAINING TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTERS, GLAZIERS AND FLOORCOVERERS SAFETY TRAINING TRUST FUND; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTERS AND FLOORCOVERERS JOINT COMMITTEE; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN NEVADA PAINTERS AND DECORATORS AND GLAZIERS LABOR- MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE EMPLOYEE PAINTERS’ TRUST; THE 2 BD. OF TRUSTEES V. CHAMBERS

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS VACATION TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA LABORERS LOCAL 872 TRAINING TRUST; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 525 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST AND PLAN; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS UNION LOCAL 525 PENSION PLAN; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 525 APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMAN TRAINING TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SHANNON CHAMBERS, Nevada Labor Commissioner, in her official capacity, Defendant-Appellant.

Filed May 22, 2019 BD. OF TRUSTEES V. CHAMBERS 3 ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.