Carlos Almeida v. Clark Ducart
Carlos Almeida v. Clark Ducart
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 12 2019 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
CARLOS ALMEIDA, No. 17-16302 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02689-JD Northern District of California, v. San Francisco CLARK E. DUCART, Warden; R. BELL, Assistant Warden; D. GONGORA; J. ORDER BEESON, Special Agent; R. BURT, Special Agent; B. NEAL, Counselor, Defendants-Appellees.
Before: GRABER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,* District Judge.
The mandate issued on May 16, 2019 is recalled, and the panel issues the following changes to the memorandum disposition filed April 24, 2019: Page 1, lines 1–2, replacing “pro se federal habeas petition” with “Section 1983 complaint” Page 2, line 3, replacing “petition” with “complaint” No further motions will be entertained in this case, and the mandate will be reissued forthwith. The petition for panel rehearing, filed June 6, 2019, is DENIED.
* The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.