NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10171 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00272-JAD- CWH-1 v. ROSE MARIE DAVIS, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 15, 2019** Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Rose Marie Davis appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges her guilty-plea convictions and aggregate 34-month sentence for mail theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708; using or trafficking in an unauthorized access device, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2), (c)(1)(A)(i); and aggravated identity

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Davis’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Davis the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Davis waived the right to appeal her conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 18-10171