United States v. Randall Gonzalez
United States v. Randall Gonzalez
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30017 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00051-TOR-1 v. MEMORANDUM* RANDALL GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 19, 2019** Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Randall Gonzalez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea convictions and 87-month concurrent sentences for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and being a felon and domestic violence misdemeanant in possession of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), (9). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Gonzalez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 19-30017
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.