United States v. Arquarius Robertson
United States v. Arquarius Robertson
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 12 2019 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-10351
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00141-JAD-VCF-1 v.
ARQUARIUS ROBERTSON, ORDER*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 10, 2019** San Francisco, California
Before: MELLOY,*** CLIFTON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
In light of the Government’s acknowledgment in its letter brief filed
September 9, 2019, the conviction of Defendant-Appellant Arquarius Robertson
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. for Use of a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence, under 18 U.S.C. § 924
June 30, 2015, is vacated. The case is remanded to the district court for
resentencing on the remaining conviction.
REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished