United States v. Alexander Greybull

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Alexander Greybull

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-30073

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00020-SPW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM* ALEXANDER GREYBULL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2019** Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Alexander Greybull appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 180-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a); possession of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Greybull’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Greybull the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 19-30073

Reference

Status
Unpublished