U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2019

United States v. Heon-Cheol Chi

United States v. Heon-Cheol Chi
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 19, 2019
942 F.3d 1159 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Heon-Cheol Chi

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-50358 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00824-JFW-1 HEON-CHEOL CHI, ORDER AMENDING Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed November 19, 2019 Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Benjamin H. Settle, * District Judge.

ORDER The opinion filed on August 30, 2019, is amended as follows: Slip opinion page 21: DELETE <And on May, 24 2015—approximately six months before the wire transfers—>. In its place ADD <In another,>.

* The Honorable Benjamin H. Settle, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

2 UNITED STATES V. CHI The amended sentence shall read, “In another, Chi sent Kinemetrics an email providing them with confidential information about a competing company.”

With the foregoing amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Rawlinson and Bea have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Settle so recommends.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No additional petitions for rehearing will be permitted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.