NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 25 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10031 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:17-cr-00198-JAS-DTF-1 v. ALI MUKHTAR OSMAN, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 18, 2019** Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Ali Mukhtar Osman appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his jury-trial conviction and sentence of time served plus ten days for unlawful bringing in of a firearm or ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(l), 924(a)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Osman’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Osman the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 19-10031