United States v. Season Eagleman
United States v. Season Eagleman
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 26 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-35966 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:16-cv-00073-BMM 4:06-cr-00080-BMM-1 v. SEASON HOPE EAGLEMAN, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 22, 2019** Portland, Oregon Before: FARRIS, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Season Hope Eagleman appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to vacate her sentence imposed in connection with Count Two of the indictment: use of a firearm during a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A), where the predicate “crime of violence” is assault with a dangerous weapon under 18
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). We affirm.
For the reasons set forth in our concurrently filed opinion in United States v. Gobert, No. 17-35970, we hold that assault with a dangerous weapon qualifies as a crime of violence under § 924(c)(3)(A).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.