NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KOFI OBENG-AMPONSAH, No. 19-55476 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:16-cv-01054-R-AFM v. MEMORANDUM* TIM GENOVESE, as an individual; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding** Submitted June 2, 2020*** Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Kofi Obeng-Amponsah appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging race discrimination under the Fair Housing Act and other federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The judgment on appeal was entered by District Judge Manuel L.

Real, who passed away prior to the notice of appeal being filed. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992). We reverse and remand.

The district court sua sponte dismissed Obeng-Amponsah’s action as a sanction eight days after the amended complaint was due. However, the district court failed to consider less drastic alternatives to dismissal with prejudice and failed to warn Obeng-Amponsah that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply with the court’s order. See id. at 1260 (dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(b) “is a harsh penalty and ... should only be imposed in extreme circumstances”); Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (“The district court need not exhaust every sanction short of dismissal before finally dismissing a case, but must explore possible and meaningful alternatives.”); see also Oliva v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 272, 274 (9th Cir. 1992) (“The district judge has an obligation to warn the plaintiff that dismissal is imminent.”) Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand with instructions to reinstate the action and accept Obeng-Amponsah’s second amended complaint for filing.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

2 19-55476