Donald Steven Parks v. Kimberly Husted
Donald Steven Parks v. Kimberly Husted
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 11 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: DONALD STEVEN PARKS, No. 19-60009 Debtor. BAP No. 18-1088 ------------------------------ MEMORANDUM* DONALD STEVEN PARKS, Appellant, v. KIMBERLY J. HUSTED, Trustee, Appellee.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Lafferty, Brand, and Spraker, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Submitted June 2, 2020** Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Chapter 7 debtor Donald Steven Parks appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Parks a discharge. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We affirm.
In the opening brief, Parks fails to address how the bankruptcy court erred in granting him a discharge. As a result, Parks has waived any challenge to the bankruptcy court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief.”).
Parks’s request for fees and costs, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.
AFFIRMED.
2 19-60009
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.