NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10255 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00240-KJM-1 v. MEMORANDUM* MARK CORUM, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 14, 2020** Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Mark Corum appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 360-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2), and four counts of production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Corum contends that the district court procedurally erred by applying a two- level enhancement for his role as an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of the production offenses. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). We need not resolve this issue because, even if the district court erred, the error was harmless. See United States v. Munoz-Camarena, 631 F.3d 1028, 1030 (9th Cir. 2011) (alleged Guidelines calculation errors are reviewed for harmlessness). The record reflects that, even without the challenged enhancement, the Guidelines range was life, adjusted to 1,680 months under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2. See United States v. McCarns, 900 F.3d 1141, 1146 (9th Cir. 2018) (declining to reach challenge to three-level enhancement because it did not affect the Guidelines range). Moreover, the enhancement appears to have had no effect on the district court’s decision to impose a sentence 110 years below the Guidelines range.

AFFIRMED.

2 19-10255