NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10213 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00328-KJD-NJK-5 v. ANTHONY NAVARRO, AKA Anthony MEMORANDUM* Andrew Navarro, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 4, 2019** San Francisco, California Before: PAEZ and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and CHOE-GROVES,*** Judge.

Anthony Navarro appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 87-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jennifer Choe-Groves, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Navarro’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Navarro the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

In the plea agreement, Navarro waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief. Accordingly, Navarro’s counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Navarro’s appeal is DISMISSED.