U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2020

United States v. Fermin Ortuno-Valdovinos

United States v. Fermin Ortuno-Valdovinos
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 29, 2020

United States v. Fermin Ortuno-Valdovinos

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 29 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10002 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:19-cr-02058-CKJ-JR-1 v. MEMORANDUM* FERMIN ORTUNO-VALDOVINOS, AKA Fermin Ortuno, AKA Fermin Ortuno- Valdivinos, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 26, 2020** Before: McKEOWN, RAWLINSON, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Fermin Ortuno-Valdovinos appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ortuno-Valdovinos’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ortuno-Valdovinos the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

2 20-10002

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.