Quan Jin v. William Barr
Quan Jin v. William Barr
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 4 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT QUAN BIN JIN, No. 13-70415
Petitioner, Agency No. A087-957-040 v.
ORDER WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 11, 2018*
Honolulu, Hawaii Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
The panel has voted to grant Jin’s petition for panel rehearing in light of this court’s en banc decision in Torres v. Barr, No. 13-70653, 2020 WL 5668478 (9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2020) (en banc) (overruling Minto v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 619 (9th Cir. 2017)). The prior memorandum disposition (Dkt. 65) in this case is vacated. Jin’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.
*
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Jin’s petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is remanded to the agency to determine in the first instance whether alternative grounds for removability exist under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6).
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished