U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2021

United States v. Selso Orona

United States v. Selso Orona
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 18, 2021
987 F.3d 892 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Selso Orona

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-17508 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 2:16-cv-02160-SRB 2:11-cr-00856-SRB-1 SELSO RANDY ORONA, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER

Filed February 18, 2021 Order 2 UNITED STATES V. ORONA COUNSEL Michael Bailey, United States Attorney; Krissa M. Lanham, Assistant United States Attorney; United States Attorney’s Office, Phoenix, Arizona; for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender; Keith J. Hilzendeger, Assistant Federal Public Defender; Office of the Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona; Jean-Claude André, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Santa Monica, California; for Defendant-Appellee.

ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: This Court previously stayed en banc proceedings in this case pending the Supreme Court’s issuance of a decision in United States v. Borden, 769 Fed. App’x 266 (6th Cir. 2019), cert. granted, No. 19-5410, 2020 WL 981806 (U.S. Mar. 2, 2020) (mem.). On January 28, 2021, the government informed this Court that defendant-appellee, Selso Randy Orona, passed away. Due to Orona’s death, we dismiss this appeal and “remand this case to the district court for dismissal of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus as moot and for further proceedings as may be required, including the vacatur of any prior orders.” Stanley v. Ryan, 716 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir. 2013).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.