Sam Consiglio, Jr. v. Pamela Ahlin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Sam Consiglio, Jr. v. Pamela Ahlin

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAM CONSIGLIO, Jr., No. 19-17496

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-01268-AWI-SAB

v. MEMORANDUM* PAMELA AHLIN; BRANDON PRICE,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2021**

Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

California civil detainee Sam Consiglio, Jr. appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Consiglio failed to include any argument in his opening brief regarding the

district court’s dismissal of his action as untimely under the applicable statute of

limitations, and thus has waived any challenge to that issue. See McKay v.

Ingleson, 558 F.3d 888, 891 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009) (arguments not raised in an

appellant’s opening brief are waived).

AFFIRMED.

2 19-17496

Reference

Status
Unpublished