United States v. Micheal Oman
United States v. Micheal Oman
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 22 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30073 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-00060-TMB-DMS-2 v. MICHEAL RYAN OMAN, AKA Donkey, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 20, 2021** Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Micheal Ryan Oman appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 92-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Oman’s counsel has filed a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Oman the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Oman waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2 20-30073
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.