U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2021

Balkrishna Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP

Balkrishna Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 4, 2021
998 F.3d 897 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Balkrishna Setty v. Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BALKRISHNA SETTY, individually and as No. 18-35573 general partner in Shrinivas Sugandhalaya Partnership with Nagraj Setty; SHRINIVAS D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01146-RAJ SUGANDHALAYA (BNG) LLP, Western District of Washington, Seattle Plaintiffs-Appellees, ORDER WITHDRAWING v. OPINION SHRINIVAS SUGANDHALAYA LLP, Defendant-Appellant.

Before: D.W. NELSON, RAWLINSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

The opinion filed January 20, 2021, and appearing at 986 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2021), is withdrawn. It may not be cited by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. A new disposition will be filed in due course. Accordingly, appellant Shrinivas Sugandhalaya LLP’s petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. Subsequent petitions for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed following the filing of a new disposition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.