NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30090

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00023-SPW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM* DAWAN DEONTE JONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021** Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Dawan Deonte Jones appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 6-month custodial sentence and 51-month term of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jones’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Jones has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

Jones’s pro se request to terminate his supervised release is denied without prejudice to renewal in the district court at the appropriate time. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1).

Within 7 days of this disposition, appellee must serve the disposition on appellant individually and provide the court with proof of service, including appellant’s mailing address.

AFFIRMED.

2 21-30090