FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 30 2021 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LISA VARGAS, No. 21-55054

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-03279-PSG-AS v.

NIKOLIS PEREZ, an individual; MEMORANDUM* JONATHAN ROJAS, an individual,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a governmental entity; DOES, 1 to 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2021** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: LINN,*** BYBEE, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

When an interlocutory appeal challenges the district court’s determination

that there is sufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute as to material fact, we

lack appellate jurisdiction. Estate of Anderson v. Marsh, 985 F.3d 726 (9th Cir.

2021). Because appellants’ appeal amounts to a challenge to the district court’s

decision on the facts, we lack jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

*** The Honorable Richard Linn, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. 2