NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 22 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT M. MEAD, No. 21-15368

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00578-DB

v. MEMORANDUM* CAROLYN INEZ WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Deborah L. Barnes, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted February 15, 2022***

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Robert M. Mead appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting

defendant’s post-judgment motion in Mead’s action alleging federal and state law

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In its order, the district court clarified that the parties’ state court case, In re

Marriage of Mead and Williams-Mead, was not removed to the district court. For

the reasons set forth in the district court’s order, we affirm.

Mead’s motion to recall the mandate in appeal No. 20-17370 and to

consolidate that appeal with this appeal is denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 21-15368