NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 20 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NELSON SOSA-GUARDADO, AKA Jose No. 16-72403 Oscar Hernandez-Salomon,

Agency No. A200-964-186

Petitioner, v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2022** Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Nelson Sosa-Guardado, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Sosa-Guardado does not raise, and therefore waives, any challenge to the dispositive grounds relied on by the agency in denying his claims for asylum and withholding of removal. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in an opening brief are waived).

We do not reach Sosa-Guardado’s contentions concerning the cognizability of his proposed particular social group because the agency did not deny relief on this ground. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010) (the court’s review is limited to the actual grounds relied upon by the BIA).

To the extent Sosa-Guardado contends the agency violated his right to due process, we reject his contentions as unsupported by the record.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

2 16-72403