United States v. Thomas Bailey
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30235
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos.
1:15-cr-00065-SPW-1 v. 1:15-cr-00065-SPW THOMAS GREGORY BAILEY,
MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 9, 2023** Portland, Oregon
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and FORREST and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Thomas Gregory Bailey (“Defendant”) appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We review the district court’s denial of compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021). We
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Defendant’s motion for compassionate release. A district court has discretion to deny a motion for compassionate release based solely on an analysis of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1284 (9th Cir. 2021). Here, the district court properly considered the § 3553(a) factors: it considered Defendant’s sentence, the sentencing court’s stated reasons for making Defendant’s sentences consecutive, and Defendant’s criminal history. The district court recognized Defendant’s good work during his time in prison but concluded that Defendant “still has a significant debt left to pay,” and therefore, compassionate release was not warranted.
Because we conclude the district court properly exercised its discretion to deny compassionate release based on an analysis of the § 3553(a) factors, we need not address Defendant’s argument regarding his eligibility for safety valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.