Chi-Poot v. Garland
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 14 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FREDI CHI-POOT, No. 22-1266 Agency No. Petitioner, A200-551-364 v.
MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 12, 2023**
San Francisco, California
Before: S.R. THOMAS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Fredi Chi-Poot petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ June 28, 2022 decision denying his motion to reconsider and his motion to reopen. Chi-Poot did not address this decision or any of its reasoning in his opening brief. He thus forfeited the opportunity to contest the Board’s decision. See Corro-Barragan v. Holder, 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013). The
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. arguments Chi-Poot has presented, moreover, are not properly before this court. Those arguments concern issues the Board addressed in its November 8, 2019 and January 25, 2021 decisions, which Chi-Poot has not appealed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5) (a petition for review is “the sole and exclusive means for judicial review of an order of removal” entered under the Immigration and Nationality Act).1
PETITION DENIED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.