NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 18 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KHALID N. KHAN, No. 23-15538 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00954-DAD-AC v. MEMORANDUM * U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AKA U.S.Bank.com, N.A., As Beneficiary; S.A. CHALLENGER, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 10, 2023** Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Khalid N. Khan appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration following the district court’s judgment dismissing his action arising from a home loan and foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a denial of a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Khan’s motion for reconsideration because Khan did not identify any mistake, newly discovered evidence, fraud, or extraordinary circumstances that would justify relief. See id. at 1263 (setting forth grounds for reconsideration).

AFFIRMED.

2 23-15538