Lawrence v. Garland
Lawrence v. Garland
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 24 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ADE ADEMOLA LAWRENCE, No. 23-3557 Agency No. Petitioner, A099-286-803 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 16, 2024**
Before: SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Ade Ademola Lawrence, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision finding him removable. We have jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, including whether a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). conviction is an aggravated felony. Valdez v. Garland, 28 F.4th 72, 76-77 (9th Cir.
2022). We deny the petition for review.
Because Lawrence’s conviction for conspiracy to possess, aboard an
aircraft, with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of
sections 959(b)(1), 960(b)(1)(B)(ii), and 963 of the Controlled Substances Import
and Export Act, 21 U.S.C. § 951 et seq., is a felony punishable under one of the
federal drug laws listed in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(2), it is a “drug trafficking crime”
and thus an aggravated felony rendering him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227
8 U.S.C. § 1101(1)(43)(B) (an aggravated felony includes a “drug trafficking
crime” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)); 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(2) (a “drug
trafficking crime” includes any felony punishable under the Controlled Substances
Import and Export Act).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 23-3557
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished