Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood City

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood City, 120 F.4th 696 (9th Cir. 2024)

Kristin Hart v. City of Redwood City

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTIN HART, individually and as No. 22-17008 co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART; E.H., individually and D.C. No. 4:21-cv- as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent 02653-YGR KYLE HART; W.H., individually and as co-successor-in-interest to Decedent KYLE HART, ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, a municipal corporation; DANIEL MULHOLLAND, individually and in his capacity as Chief of Police for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; ROMAN GOMEZ, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; LEILA VELEZ, individually and in her official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF REDWOOD CITY,

Defendants-Appellants

Filed October 30, 2024 2 HART V. CITY OF REDWOOD CITY

Before: Eric D. Miller, Bridget S. Bade, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Judge Miller, Judge Bade, and Judge VanDyke have voted to deny Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The majority of the active judges have voted to deny rehearing the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Reference

Status
Published