William Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
William Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEC 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
WILLIAM KIVETT; et al., No. 21-15667
Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-05131-WHA
Northern District of California,
v. San Francisco
FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: BYBEE and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON,* District Judge.
Flagstar Bank’s petition for panel rehearing, filed October 7, 2024, is
GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on August 22, 2024, is withdrawn
and submission is vacated pending further order of the court. The court intends to
schedule oral argument on a date to be determined. With the withdrawal of the
memorandum disposition filed on August 22, 2024, Flagstar Bank’s petition for
rehearing en banc is denied as moot.
The court requests simultaneous supplemental briefing by the parties
addressing whether California Civil Code § 2954.8(a) is preempted by the National
Bank Act under the standard and methodology described in Cantero v. Bank of
America, N.A., 602 U.S. 205 (2024). The simultaneous briefs may not exceed
*
The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the
District of Arizona, sitting by designation.
12,000 words and shall be due 30 days from the date of this order.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished