U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2024

William Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb

William Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 24, 2024
William Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEC 24 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS WILLIAM KIVETT; et al., No. 21-15667 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-05131-WHA Northern District of California, v. San Francisco FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BYBEE and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON,* District Judge.

Flagstar Bank’s petition for panel rehearing, filed October 7, 2024, is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on August 22, 2024, is withdrawn and submission is vacated pending further order of the court. The court intends to schedule oral argument on a date to be determined. With the withdrawal of the memorandum disposition filed on August 22, 2024, Flagstar Bank’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

The court requests simultaneous supplemental briefing by the parties addressing whether California Civil Code § 2954.8(a) is preempted by the National Bank Act under the standard and methodology described in Cantero v. Bank of America, N.A., 602 U.S. 205 (2024). The simultaneous briefs may not exceed 12,000 words and shall be due 30 days from the date of this order.

* The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.