U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2024

Paulette Smith v. Edward Agdeppa

Paulette Smith v. Edward Agdeppa
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 1, 2024
94 F.4th 903 (Federal Reporter, Fourth Series)
Paulette Smith v. Edward Agdeppa

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULETTE SMITH, individually and No. 20-56254 as Successor in Interest to Albert

Dorsey, deceased, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05370- Plaintiff-Appellee, CAS-JC v. ORDER EDWARD AGDEPPA, an individual,

Defendant-Appellant, and

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 10,

Defendants.

Filed March 1, 2024

Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan Christen, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.

Order 2 SMITH V. AGDEPPA

ORDER

Judge Callahan and Judge Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Christen voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 65, is DENIED.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.