Paulette Smith v. Edward Agdeppa
Paulette Smith v. Edward Agdeppa
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PAULETTE SMITH, individually and No. 20-56254 as Successor in Interest to Albert Dorsey, deceased, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05370- Plaintiff-Appellee, CAS-JC v. ORDER EDWARD AGDEPPA, an individual, Defendant-Appellant, and CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 10, Defendants.
Filed March 1, 2024 Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan Christen, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.
Order 2 SMITH V. AGDEPPA
ORDER Judge Callahan and Judge Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Christen voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 65, is DENIED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.