U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2024

Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt

Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2024
95 F.4th 1152 (Federal Reporter, Fourth Series)
Project Veritas v. Michael Schmidt

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PROJECT VERITAS; PROJECT VERITAS No. 22-35271 ACTION FUND,

D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01435-MO Plaintiffs-Appellants, District of Oregon, Portland v.

ORDER

MICHAEL SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as Multnomah County District

Attorney; ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Oregon Attorney General,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judges Forrest and H.A. Thomas did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.